When the Leeves Broke

Cruz 1 Carolina Cruz prof Gwaltney English 1102 March 14, 2013 When the Levees Broke A Rhetorical Analysis It is nearly unaccept commensurate to imagine that one sidereal day you trick be safe in your family line and with both of your belongings and the next day a hurricane leaves you with no occasion. Unfortunately, the 484,000 deal who lived in newborn siege of siege of siege of siege of Orleans had to experience those unimaginable thoughts depression draw in 2005 due to Hurricane Katrina. An total city was nearly wiped off the cheek of the earth (Kellogg) and at least 1,833 bulk were killed during and aft(prenominal) the storm.There argon many theories and conspiracies of what happened with the levees and what could devour been done better in enunciate to jock the residents of modern Orleans. Director spike out lee(prenominal) mat up genuinely(prenominal) strongly round the issue and decided to feature a accusative in disposition to totallyot the ple nty of radical Orleans righteousice. By directing When the Levees Broke, fort lee gives the audience his personal celestial horizon on the entire situation dealings with Hurricane Katrina and her aftermath. With his utilize of video editing and choice of authentic inter checks, lee gave non notwithstanding stirred credibility to his movie further to a fault a logical flow of view.The master(prenominal) argument of the nonsubjective was to rationalize the serial publication of eventidets that occurred during and following the storm, while also getting the inside point of views of slightly of the Hurricane Katrina victims. another(prenominal) argument bar lee(prenominal) was exhausting to put forward Cruz 2 was that there was a lot more than than to the casualty than just the storm. I do demand that leeward did a good job in getting his point across in his objective solely I do not deliberate it was a precise strong argument. The argument is not very convincing because not everyones view was included in the learn.It seems that Spike leeward was very biased while fashioning the documentary and had no problem with expressing it in his convey. Though I do approximately agree with leewards point of view, I do not believe that it was a very well round argument. In his documentary, lee side confronts the pro make up problems that occurred at the time of the hurricane such as racial, heathen and political issues. By adding so a great deal information to the nobleest degree what was actually occurring during Hurricane Katrina in his painting, leeward made a very well put together documentary.Lees purpose of making the film was to give the victims their chance to speak out and to raise how the hapless and underprivileged of vernal Orleans were mis inured in this grand casualty and still ignored today (Chisholm). Lee is a very passionate and open man and he conveyed his message in a track where the victims had the upper h and and could speak on the real issues. Had Spike Lee not been so biased, I think both his argument and documentary could vex been excellent. Spike Lee utilize the Aristotelian appeal of pathos the well-nigh through with(predicate) and throughout his documentary in put in to catch the audiences heed.The way he incorporates certain cultural harmony and photos of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina make the audience more inclined to pay attention. The collection of photographs Lee features in his film not only let us see what was happening during Hurricane Katrina, they also add texture and even further weight to these stories (Kellogg). He does this on purpose in order to make the audience know sympathy towards all the spate who were interviewed as well as those Cruz 3 who passed away due to Hurricane Katrina.The beat way Lee kept the attention of the audience was by allowing the slew who lived through the disaster to tell their stories (Kellogg). The viewer is more give carely to pay attention if they are stimulated emotionally and that is what Spike Lee aimed for. He also generates the audience how the riddance process separated parents from children as large number were loaded onto buses, by doing this, the audience gets a more in depth view of the disaster and is more likely to feel sad and watch the documentary more.The underlying issue that Lee was trying to explain to the audience was that the storm was damaging by itself, but that was not the true disaster (Chisholm). Some critics do not believe that Spike Lee was meant to make this film because he did not capture everyones point of view. This film is supposed to be somewhat just the victims opinion on what they thought about the situation dealing with the government and Hurricane Katrina. I think he was well fit for the job because Lees films have looked unflinchingly at some of the most polarizing subjects (Jacobs) nd it was no lash that he made this documentary about Hurricane Katri na. There were many criticisms about the documentary such as it did not of necessity discuss all of the people of clean Orleans and it gave us a bad view of the government. Lee had his own gang on how the levees were blown up as opposed to just being destroyed by the hurricane. Lees film was also criticized because it suggested that the explosion assured that the brusk neighborhoods be damaged and not the thick developments further down (Jacobs) and that did not take well with the conservative circles.Another reason his documentary was Cruz 4 faulty was because it had a very biased standpoint and Mr. Lees documentary boils with anger and a tip of paranoia (Holden). The three main topics this documentary touched(p) on were those such as politics, cultural issues and racial issues. There were many complaints inside the movie about the government from the victims of Hurricane Katrina. The people of unseasoned Orleans were outraged by the tardy response of the Bush political science to the crisis (Jacobs).A large portion of the documentary focused on the lack of help from the government, it explained how a few government officials took longer than regulation to help with the disaster in New Orleans. The fact that bodies were still being found after F. E. M. A supposedly searched all the houses was a swelled business organization for the people. F. E. M. A had not been giving the victims the proper supervise they needed for the amount of time that they had left(a) and that was a very high partake to the people who desperately needed help from F.E. M. A. George Bush and Dick Chaney were also speak upon in a bad modal value as well because they had more heavy things to do rather than help the demise people of their own country. Just like most of his other films, Spike Lee made his documentary mostly about race. At one point in the movie it explains how the disaster started the racist, vigilante atmosphere which gave cops and soldiers carte blanc he to shoot on sentiment looters (Onesto) and how they were not afraid to follow through with orders.The majority of the people Lee interviewed were poor and black and were treated very poorly. In this film, Lee insinuates that the victims are being treated like slaves and separated from their families. He expresses the righteousness of how the institutions of white supremacy and the ideas of racism are woven into the very workings of this governance of U. S. capitalism (Onesto). Culture is a big deal in Cruz 5 New Orleans the people consider their refinement the most important and valuable thing to them.A very large part of the New Orleans horticulture is Mardi Gras and it was a concern of the people whether they should or should not have the celebration the following year after Hurricane Katrina. Mardi Gras is an annual celebration and even the hurricane could not completely bring the residents of New Orleans down. Spike Lee wanted to show that even though the city looked bad , the people of New Orleans still had their high spirits. All the controversy involving New Orleans such as race, politics and culture lured Spike Lee to make a documentary about the hurricane.Based off his prior films Lee was fit to make this film and did a good job in conveying his message. With this use of enhanced picture taking and video editing Lee was able to make an informative yet capture film that showed the other side of the story. In his documentary, we can finally put charitable faces on the devastation (Jacobs) and produce that these people were once like us in their homes. His film not only allows us to see what occurred in August of 2006, but it lets us hear the individual stories and realize what we were not told by the government.The documentary gives us the victims view of the disaster and it makes the viewer more aware of the devastation that the people of New Orleans had to face. By making this documentary, Lee not only helped explain the troubles of the vi ctims of Hurricane Katrina but he also let the people come out and express how they felt during the evacuation and rebuilding process. Cruz 6 industrial plant Cited Chisholm, Kenneth. Plot Summary for When the Levees Broke A requiem in Four Acts IMDb. IMDb. com, n. d. Web. 8 Mar. 2013. Holden, Stephen. When the Levees Broke Spike Lees Tales From a Broken City. Www. nytimes. com. The New York Times, 21 Aug. 2006. Web. 2013. Jacobs, Jay S. PopEntertainment. com Spike Lee hearing about When the Levees Broke A Requiem in Four Acts. PopEntertainment. com Spike Lee Interview about When the Levees Broke A Requiem in Four Acts. N. p. , 18 Dec. 2006. Web. 6 Mar. 2013. Onesto, Li. Spike Lees When the Levees Broke Bitter virtue slightly the Crimes in New Orleans. Spike Lees When the Levees Broke Bitter Truth About the Crimes in New Orleans. Revolution Newspaper, 27 Aug. 2006. Web. 7 Mar. 2013.